I fail to understand all the noise media is making about not needing men anymore just because a few scientists have discovered how to create human sperms from stem cells now.
Now how does that make a man redundant?
Please don’t get me wrong here, a man can certainly be an object of pleasure for a woman, but this pleasure I am talking about, extends beyond the bed! Yes, it does!
We frequently come across this question of what life would be without women..?
lets just put all the women on hold here. The question now is, what life would be without men here?
I pity women who say that they don’t need a man for anything; there are untold pleasures these women have yet to discover!
And once again, I am not talking sex here. Well, not just.And even if we talk sex, how does that boil down to just sperms? Now just come to think of it that every time a man and a woman come together for sex, how many times are relevant sperm-wise? The average couple may have 2 children, and sex say twice a week, making it 104 times a year and so around 3,120 times for an average marriage span of 30 years. In all these romps, the sperm is relevant just twice, or lets say eight more times, taking in account all the failed attempts. Now this account for just 0.3 percent of their total sex life.
And now they say that the artificially created sperm makes men redundant. What crap!
Who says creation of lab sperms can make men redundant? Babies or no, women need men for qualities beyond the bed! ( a bit of reality check)
Who says creation of lab sperms can make men redundant? Babies or no, women need men for qualities beyond the bed! ( a bit of reality check)
